Search This Blog

De Omnibus Dubitandum - Lux Veritas

Thursday, April 25, 2024

The Left’s Anti-Semitism Problem Gets Out of Control

Riots at Columbia and other Ivy League schools reveal the bigotry of progressives. 

By @ Liberty Nation News, Apr 24, 2024 Tags: Articles, Good Reads, Opinion, Politics

For years, the political left has tried to associate anti-Semitism with the right. As it turns out – and it shouldn’t really come as a surprise – the bastions of progressive thought in the United States are also hotbeds of anti-Semitism. New York University, Columbia, Yale, and other colleges across the country have been plunged into chaos by violent anti-Jewish mobs. For the most part, college presidents and senior faculty members are facilitating the chaos – or not doing very much to end it, while issuing tepid responses.

Certain prominent left-wing newspapers are now referring to the rioters as “anti-war demonstrators.” This lines up with the left’s false narrative that it’s all about protesting Israel’s invasion of the Gaza Strip and nothing at all to do with anti-Semitism.

The facts paint a different story, however. Jewish students have reported being harassed and, in some cases, even physically assaulted. The mobs besieging these universities and colleges are not solely focused on condemning Israel for its military actions in Gaza, they are using much broader anti-Semitic rhetoric. If they are trying to pretend that this is about being anti-war and not anti-Jewish, they don’t seem to be fooling anybody.

Anti-Semitism Washes Over Columbia

New York City Mayor Eric Adams on April 21 referred to one example: a young woman at Columbia holding a sign with an arrow pointing to Jewish students, with the caption “Al-Qasam’s Next Targets” – Al-Qasam being the military wing of the terrorist group Hamas. “I am horrified and disgusted with the anti-Semitism being spewed at and around the Columbia University campus,” Adams said.

The riots have divided the left and the Democratic Party. While moderates and more traditionally liberal Democrats are roundly condemning the rampant anti-Semitism displayed by the campus rioters, progressives are openly siding with pro-Hamas agitators. Minnesota Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar praised her daughter who was suspended from Columbia University’s Barnard College after taking in a pro-Palestinian protest. Omar once infamously said “some people did something” as a way of describing the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attack.

Joe Biden, as usual, is not leading by example. When asked by a reporter about the issue on April 22, he couldn’t bring himself to condemn anti-Semitism without immediately adding, “I also condemn those who don’t know what’s going on with the Palestinians.”

Meanwhile, in what amounts to a slap in the face for those not taking part in the violent demonstrations, Columbia has informed its students that the university will be switching to virtual or hybrid classes. In effect, the university’s president, Minouche Shafik, has given anti-Semitism her blessing, one could argue, instructing students not to attend class in person so that the demonstrations can continue. New York Rep. Richie Torres, a Democrat, said Shafik’s decision to suspend in-person classes was a choice to “surrender control of Columbia to an anti-Semitic fringe.” Blasting Shafik’s apparent capitulation, Torres said, “If you cannot ensure the safety of your students, then you have no business serving as president of any university, let alone the alma mater of Alexander Hamilton.”

 
Read More From Graham J Noble

Death Comes Knocking (but has the wrong address)

For Life, Liberty and Property 

By Sean Gabb 21 April, 2024 @ Free Life

At 10:45am on Monday the 20th August 2023, I was sat at the desk in my teaching room, thinking about what electro-junk to pack for a family holiday in Greece. All of a sudden, I came over queasy.

“I don’t feel very well,” I said to Mrs Gabb.

“How don’t you feel very well?” she asked.

The answer was that I was feeling queasy, and then queasier than ever I could remember.

I am told that I lurched forward and stopped breathing. My own recollection, between looking down at a USB stick and sitting in a different position with an aspirin in my mouth, is of absolutely nothing. There had been no blackness with a continued perception of time. It had been like no kind of sleep. There had been a minute or so of nothing. As I began wondering what had happened, my wife was shouting into the telephone, arguing with the emergency services. I blinked and suggested that I was perfectly fine. I promptly blacked out again. This time, I remained semi-conscious. I was aware I had stopped breathing, and I told myself to start again. My wife tells me I was taking in terrible gasps and looked as if I were dying.

Almost at once, an ambulance arrived, and two women gave me an ECG examination. They said my heart was going at about thirty beats a minute, and that my blood pressure was dangerously low. I asked if there was any evidence of a stroke or heart attack. They said there was none, but that I might die unless they took me straight to hospital. I thought about this. I had suffered no pain in my chest or left arm, nor any confusion or loss of vision. But the assurance of possibly immediate death was alarming. So I went off in their ambulance to the nearest main hospital, where I spent eight hours with my women and a shifting cast of kind and attentive but broadly incompetent persons of diversity. At last, someone who spoke English came into the room to confirm I had suffered neither a stroke nor a heart attack, and that I showed no signs of diabetes or anything else in the blood tests. After this, I announced that we were going home.

No holiday to Greece the next day. Instead, my women lectured me on how everything was somehow my fault, and that I should drink less coffee and sleep more. Over the next week, I visited half a dozen medical specialists. They all confirmed that I was in apparently perfect health. After the last set of tests, they agreed with my own explanation, and told me to be more careful in future.

We did eventually get to Greece, for a very nice fortnight at the end of October. The weather was more like a good English summer than my usual experience of the Mediterranean. There were almost no other tourists. We drove about the Peloponnese on empty roads, and walked for hours through empty museums. We climbed to the top of Mistra with no company but a busload of Chinese students, to whom I gave a lecture on Byzantine history.

But this is a digression. I have mentioned my own explanation of what happened. I suppose I should give this now.

At the end of July, I had asked my dentist to put a crown on one of my crumbling teeth. He did this, and it hurt almost at once. I took the pain as something that would pass in a few days. But we went off almost at once to Slovakia, where the pain continued and grew steadily worse. It was the worst pain I had ever suffered, and words fail to describe how bad it was. It grew so bad that I began to wake up in the middle of the night when the painkillers had worn off. I would then stay awake for an hour, reading Homer until the next dose of aspirin began to take effect. After a week of this, I went to a Slovak dentist, who ignored my clear instructions and pulled out the wrong tooth. After this, I decided the painkillers were a better option than having all my teeth extracted one after the other.

On the journey back to England, the pain grew even worse. I had made an emergency dental appointment for the one day between returning from Slovakia and setting out for Greece. Back home on Sunday evening, though, I decided to give myself some relief from the pain by going to bed with a cocktail of codeine, paracetamol, aspirin and ibuprofen. The pain went away, but I woke up covered in sweat and feeling sick. I repeated the dose, ignoring all prior evidence that ibuprofen did not agree with me. Sure enough, the dose took effect and I fainted.

I think it was the ibuprofen – though the codeine may have helped. The other day, I woke up with a stiff neck. I took the opportunity presented. I rubbed in a small amount of muscle cream that contained five per cent ibuprofen. Within half an hour, I had turned red all over, and was fighting for breath. Before then, I felt as sick as on the day of the fainting attack. Mrs Gabb was displeased, though it was useful confirmation of my own earlier diagnosis.

So, I can sit here, reassured of better health than many men of advanced years and sedentary habits can boast. But does this explain why I have given up on libertarian activism? Not really. The reason for that is that the possible window for libertarianism that opened in England during the 1970s has closed. If the national collapse we now face is to be avoided, it will need less gentle solutions than I have spent my life recommending. I do not plan to remain silent forever, but think silence a sensible choice until after the next election.

The Conservative Government that came in after the 2010 election was led by men whose only plan was to get into office by lying to their electors, and then strike a deal with the Blairite Establishment. They would let this Establishment continue ruining the country in ways I do not need describe. In return, they would be left alone to grow rich from bribes and insider trading. They and their parasites wanted as easy a life as they could arrange. These arrangements involved a purge of real conservatives and of libertarians, who might otherwise embarrass the new project.

I was not the only victim of this purge. But it was souring to have my novel contracts cancelled and my existing novels remaindered, and almost to lose my teaching position when someone who later became a person of importance in the affairs of this realm – perhaps the same person who had approached my publisher – told the senior management at my place of work that I was a “right wing extremist.” Because I am one of the few people alive who can read and explain classical texts on sight, I have not been put out of work. Even so, the easy circumstances I had reasonably expected from my writings have not returned, and, while my health continues, I must earn my daily bread as a teacher of Greek and Latin.

As often as I look at the news, I burn with outrage. I choose for the moment, though, to say very little. I recent years, I suspect, I have been forgotten. I have no wish to be remembered now by men who never had much scruple when I knew them, and are now part of a network that shows decreasing respect even for the lives of those who get in their way.

The next election, it seems, will be a wipeout for the Conservatives. I cannot see any recovery from the scale of the betrayal they have delivered since 2019. There will then be reckoning with the projectors and agents of this betrayal, and I will join in the denunciations with spotless hands. Until then, I will remain as silent as I can manage.

Passover - From Slavery to Freedom

By @ Sultan Knish Blog

  

 As the first days of another Passover conclude with the echoes of "Once we were slaves and now we are free" and "Next year in Jerusalem" recited at the Seder nights ringing in our ears, we know that freedom is a lot more than being able to board a plane and fly off to Jerusalem.

Slavery did not end with the fall of Pharaoh. Since then we have become slaves again, lived under the rule of iron-fisted tyrants and forgotten what the very idea of freedom means. And that will likely happen again and again until the age of oppression ends. What is this freedom that we gained with the fall of a Pharaoh, his drowning armies, and the last sight of his pyramids?

Freedom, like slavery, is as much a state of mind as a state of being. It is possible to be legally free, yet to have no freedom of action whatsoever. And it is possible to be legally a slave and yet to be free in defiance of those restrictions. External coercion alone does not make a man free or slave.

Slavery, as all our ancestors learned at one time or another, is a state of mind.

What is a slave? A slave is complicit in his own oppression. His slavery has become his natural state and he looks to his master, not to free him, but to command him. He does not want to be free and he resents the very idea of freedom. The Jews in Egypt were not merely restrained by chains and guards. If they had been, then the task of their liberation would have been much simpler. But just as an addictive drug crosses the barrier from physical to psychological dependency, they were enslaved not just with external, but internal chains. They moaned not at the fact of slavery, but at the extremity of it. When their taskmasters complained to Pharaoh, it was not about being enslaved, but of not being given the straw with which to build the bricks that had become their duty.

The worst slavery is of the most insidious kind. It leaves the slave able to think and act, but not as a free man. It leaves him with cunning, but not courage. He is able to use force, but only to bring other slaves into line. And most hideously, this state of affairs seems moral and natural to him. This is his freedom.

The true slave has come to love big brother, to worship at the foot of the system that oppresses him. It is this twisted love that must be torn out of him. It is this idolatry of the whip before which he kneels, this panting to know who his superiors and who his inferiors are, this love of a vast order that allows him to be lost in its wonders, to gaze in awe at the empire of tomorrow which builds its own tombs today, that must be broken. These are his gods and he must kill them within himself to be free.

The Exodus is not the story of the emergence of free men who were enslaved, but the slow painful process by which slaves became a nation of free men, a long troubled journey which has not yet ended. That is why we celebrate Passover, not as an event of the past, but as of a road that we still travel on our long journey from slavery to freedom. Not just the journey of the Jews, but of humanity.

Having escaped from Pharaoh, the Jews built a glittering calf, and having left the desert behind, they sought out a king. Every idol and tyrant was another token of slavery, a desire to put one's ear up against the doorpost and become slaves for life. The idols have changed, but their meaning has not. There is still the pursuit of the master, the master of international law, of a global state, the expert gods of the superstate who rule over the present and the future and dispose of the lives of men.

There are far too many synagogues that worship the Democratic Party, rather than G-d, that bow to the ghost of FDR, and whose scriptures are to be found in the smeared ink of the New York Times. And in Jerusalem far too many eyes look longingly to Washington and to Brussels, to the cities on the hill which offer order, truth and peace.

It is easy to slip into this kind of slavery. The pyramids are grand, the slogans are clever and the future seems assured. It is only when the dusty messenger comes along to whisper that "He has remembered". that those who have not forgotten gather and some among those who have forgotten, remember that they are slaves.

In Egypt the system of the state had to be smashed, not just smashed, but discredited. The war between slavery and freedom could not end until the system of slavery had become ridiculous, until Pharaoh appeared a buffoon and his power no more than organized madness. And yet even so for a generation liberated from slavery, this majestic system, the only one they had ever known, remained their template, and in times of crisis, their immediate instinct was to retreat back to the only civilization they had known.

The slavery of the present is a more subtle thing. It grips the mind more tightly than the body. It still remembers that men enslave themselves best. It knows also that true power comes from making all complicit in its crimes so that they are also complicit in their own degradation. The system only asks that each man enslave himself and kill his own children. And once he has done that, he will only feel it right to demand that everyone else do likewise.

Do it for the environment, for social justice, for the Pharaoh of every age and his ideology. Enslave your mind. Kill your children.


This is the slavery of the system. It requires few whips and many words. It nudges men to be their own taskmasters and to reach out their hands to the new Pharaoh in the hope that he will save them. It is this slavery which is so pervasive, which Passover wakes us from, if it has not already been perverted into the Passover of the slave, into civil rights seders and eco-matzas with donations to Planned Parenthood which will do what the midwives did not.

"Once we were slaves," the ancient words call on us to remember that we have been freed. That it is no longer Pharaoh who enslaves us, but we who enslave ourselves. "Now we are free men." But what is freedom really? Is it the freedom to worship G-d or to worship the system? The system proclaims that it is god. And that is the great lie which ends in the death of the system and its slaves.

Like the slaves of ancient Egypt, we are shaken, dragged out of our everyday routine and commanded to be free. But how do you command men and women to be free? You can lead them through the habits of free men and women who think of themselves as kings and queens, who drink wine while reclining, who sing loudly in defiance of all oppressors, who boldly proclaim "Next year in Jerusalem" while the pharaohs and czars of D.C. and the EU bare their teeth at the Jews living in Jerusalem.

You can unroll the scroll of history and show them how they were taken out, but all this routine is useless unless they understand and are sensible that they are free. Free not in their habits, but in their minds. Ritual is the gateway to a state of mind. A ritual of freedom only succeeds when it invokes a state of mental freedom. Otherwise it is a rite, a practice, a habit whose codes may help some future generation unlock its meaning, but which means little today.

Passover is the beginning and the end. It is the start of the journey and the end of it and we are always in the middle, on the long road out of Egypt, discovering that there are more chains in our minds than we realized a year earlier or a hundred or a thousand years ago. Each step we take toward freedom also reminds us of how far we still have to go.

It is the ritual that reminds us that we are still on the journey, that though we have been lulled by the routine of the system, the trap of the present that like the soothing warmth of an ice storm or the peaceful feeling of a drowning swimmer, embraces us in the forgetfulness of the dying moment, concealing from us the truth that the journey is not over. The desert still lies before us.

This journey is the human journey. It is the recreation of what mankind lost when it defied G-d, when it turned with weapons on each other, when it built towers, created systems and tried to climb to heaven on the backs of slaves and pyramids. It is a transformative road that requires us to not only endure, but to learn.

Surrounded by willing slaves who preach the creed of slavery, we must speak for freedom. Though few seem to remember the journey or the chains, it is our duty to remind ourselves. The message of Passover fully begins only when the holiday ends and its habits carry over into our daily lives.

Once we were slaves, now we are free.
 
Daniel Greenfield is a columnist, an investigative journalist and a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center.

Wednesday, April 24, 2024

What You Don’t Know About NPR CEO Katherine the Not-So-Great

Look who's running the show now. 

By @ Liberty Nation News, Apr 20, 2024, Tags: Articles, Media, Opinion

 What You Don’t Know About NPR CEO Katherine the Not-So-Great

Katherine Maher was likely the perfect choice for CEO of National Public Radio (NPR) when she was appointed to that position a month ago. She is a dyed-in-the-wool leftist with a gilded professional pedigree plying her trade at organizations such as the Wikimedia Foundation, the World Economic Forum, and the Council on Foreign Relations, among others. She’s blonde, beautiful, and thoroughly steeped in the elite leftism that has overtaken American institutions.

Maher (no relation to TV personality Bill Maher) is a rabid anti-Trumpist who has called the former president a “deranged racist sociopath,” worked to “get out the vote” for Joe Biden in Arizona, and has the hard left lexicon down pat. Why does this make her perfect for a taxpayer-funded American broadcast outlet? Perhaps because she embodies what NPR has morphed into since its debut more than 50 years ago.

In heralding the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967, President Lyndon Johnson intoned: “So today we rededicate a part of the airwaves – which belong to all the people – and we dedicate them for the enlightenment of all the people.” Notice the repeated phrase “all the people.” How could such a noble concept go so awry?

NPR: Going, Going, Gone

NPR’s former senior editor, Uri Berliner, had been with the company for half its existence. Having watched the illustrious aspirations of a public broadcaster ground to dust, he could take it no longer and finally blew the whistle on what we already knew: that NPR stopped considering all things – a la their famed morning program All Things Considered – and determined to consider only some of them. Fairly adept at seeing the handwriting on the wall, Berliner left, resigning after a five-day suspension for writing an article that pointed out a lack of diversity that no longer represented America in an organization run entirely by Democrats. This is what makes NPR a perfect fit for its new CEO.

Hats off to Christopher F. Rufo, who has written an illuminating article about NPR’s new CEO by digging into the weeds of her Twitter/X posts. It appears Ms. Maher has used this platform as a cathartic friend who listens to her frustrations, joys, and all the emotions one would typically communicate to a human being. What Rufo found among this plethora of personification, i.e., attributing human characteristics to an inanimate social media platform, is very disturbing if one believes that a taxpayer-funded organization should display at least a modicum of balance.

Katherine Maher’s tweets indicate that she is a very partisan actor. As Rufo explains:

“The most troubling of these conclusions is her support for radically narrowing the range of acceptable opinions. In 2020, she argued that the New York Times should not have published Senator Tom Cotton’s op-ed, ‘Send in the Troops,’ during the George Floyd riots. In 2021, she celebrated the banishment of then-president Donald Trump from social media, writing: ‘Must be satisfying to deplatform fascists. Even more satisfying? Not platforming them in the first place.’”

In one of the videos she made while working at the Atlantic Council, Maher explained how the First Amendment is a roadblock to censorship because it is “a fairly robust protection of rights.” She firmly believes it is the job of a public platform to “regulate what kind of content they want on their sites.” One must wonder if she would feel the same way had Twitter censored some of her 29,400 tweets.

In his article on Maher, Rufo concludes: 

“The new CEO of NPR, then, is a left-wing ideologue who supports wide-scale censorship and considers the First Amendment an impediment to her campaign to sanitize the world of wrong opinions.” 

This makes her the arbiter of what is right and what is wrong.

All this would be well and good if the taxpayer could check a box and decide whether to fund public broadcasting or not. That, however, is not the case. Instead, conservatives are left with no choice: You will fund it, and you will like it.

Maher is certainly entitled to her opinions. She may spew her leftist lingo far and wide. However, as CEO of a public broadcasting entity, she has a responsibility to extend a hand of fairness, cover all sides of an issue, and let Americans decide for themselves. There is room for plenty of conservative news outlets as well as leftist ones, but National Public Radio adhering to leftist ideology goes against the very grain of its purpose.

If her Twitter/X account is any indication – and it is – then putting Ms. Maher atop a tax-payer-funded public broadcasting outlet is anathema to its original purpose and abominable to the American public.

 
Read More From Leesa K. Donner

Israel Struck Back – But What Else Were They to Do?

Iran now understands that Israel is good to its word.

There should never been any doubt Israel was going to launch a counterstrike against Iran. The Biden administration and its inside-the-beltway policy wonks could pound the table, demanding caution and “take the win” until they were blue in their faces; Israel had to respond in a compelling way to Iran’s 310-drone and missile attack on April 13. It was a deterrence imperative – and if Iran’s official response is any indication, it worked.

After Iran attacked Israel with a massive airstrike, the reply had to send a clear, unambiguous message. What we know is that most reports describe the Israeli counterstrike as a single missile that hit a military target in Iran. The message conveyed by Israel’s aerial attack memo was crystal clear: You sent over 300 missiles and drones and hit nothing, while we sent a single missile and hit the target. That’s compelling communication.

Iran Confirms Israel Hit Iranian Military Base

“Three Iranian officials confirmed that a strike had hit a military air base near the city of Isfahan, in central Iran, early on Friday [April 19], but did not say which country had mounted the attack,” The New York Times explained. It’s fair to make two observations. First, Israel let Iran know unequivocally that the Russia-supplied S-300 air defense system was helpless to prevent the attack. Additionally, the targeting of the Isfahan district lets Iran know that its nuclear research and extensive drone and missile manufacturing are at risk at any time of Israel’s choosing.

Speaking in an interview with NBC News, Iran’s Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahain called the Israeli strike inconsequential. He went on to say that Iran won’t retaliate – this time. Despite the official’s call to spin the attack as nothing worth bothering over, it’s clear Iran got the message Israel meant to send.

The April 19 Israeli missile attack is not the first time the Israel Defense Force has reached out to tap the Iranian mullahs. A little over a year agoLiberty Nation reported on an Iranian unmanned aerial vehicle factory being attacked. “[O]n Jan. 28, small Israeli UAVs began to rain down fire on Iranian targets in the dark of night. One specific military facility [located in Isfahan] was reported hit by what is believed to be small quadcopter weapons-capable drones.” Among other potential targets in the Isfahan district is the Natanz nuclear facility, Iran’s principal Uranium enrichment complex with six above-ground buildings, all of which could be easily destroyed. As chemical weapons expert and former head of UK and NATO nuclear forces Hamish de Bretton-Gordon told the BBC, the concentration of military bases in and around Isfahan made Israel’s targeting choice “very significant.”

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken emerged from the annual G7 meetings, held this year in Capri, Italy, to talk to the press. He said:

“First, the G7 condemned the unprecedented Iranian attack on Israel, unprecedented in scope and scale – scope, because it was a direct attack on Israel from Iran; scale, because it involved more than 300 munitions, including ballistic missiles. We’re committed to Israel’s security. We’re also committed to de-escalating, to trying to bring this tension to a close … The United States announced additional sanctions on Iran, targeting UAV programs, the steel industry, companies that are associated with the IRGC, the Ministry of Defence, and its armed forces’ logistics.”

The first major takeaway from Secretary Blinken’s remarks is that additional sanctions focused on several important aspects of Iran’s military capability. However, they did not address the most important element of Tehran’s ability to wreak havoc among its neighbors and Israel: oil. Iran is free to produce and sell its oil.

Oil Revenue Keeps Iran Capable of Funding Terrorism

The revenue generated, up to $10 billion annually, buys whatever Tehran requires to maintain its steel industry, its UAV production, and whatever the IRGC (Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps) needs to perpetuate its sponsorship of terrorist proxies.

But there’s another point listeners of Blinken’s comments should understand. It’s very apparent that, regardless of the G7’s hopes for de-escalating tensions in the Gulf Region, whether tensions escalate or de-escalate is completely out of the G7’s control. As we have seen, the level of conflict is out of the Biden administration’s control as well.

As the dust settles in both Israel and Iran, circumstances leading to the exchange of air attacks between the two nations have demonstrated that Israel has the more powerful military. Israel also showed the practical application of deterrence. Prior to Friday’s show of force, Iran promised to make Israel suffer should the Jewish state retaliate. But retaliate Israel has – and the official response from Iran is that they don’t plan to strike back. Perhaps there’s a lesson in this to be learned by the Biden foreign policy team.

The views expressed are those of the author and not of any other affiliate.

 
Read More From Dave Patterson

Ten (10) Ways Science is Being Attacked

There are more, but this is the condensed version...

Our modern society is 100% based on Science. Without Science, we would revert to Neanderthal (cave-man) status (i.e., lower than third-world country levels).

By and large, the public is unaware that Science has been under an intense assault for several decades now. Citizens are uninformed as the anti-Science agents are subtle in their attacks: they never come out and say that they are trying to undermine Science, they just do it. Further, the Mainstream Media is complicit with their campaign.

A good example is the K-12 Next Generation Science Standards now adopted in 49 states. It says “Next Generation” so what’s the problem? There are many — like the fact that they have scrapped the traditional Scientific Method! I’ve spelled out ten (10) problems with the NGSS in my Report: The Key to Fixing the US K-12 Education System.

A primary driver behind the assault on Science is that many environmental activists want to kill our modern society and revert to an agrarian version (think Bill McKibben). What they are effectively advocating is an idealized society that would be something like the 1800s — live in the country, with an outhouse, cow, chickens, and a few acres to grow vegetables. A horse would provide transportation.

Any practical person would see that such aspirations are fairy dust — but that is (in effect) what the result of a true “Net Zero” policy would be. Oh, and two hundred million plus American citizens would have to be “eliminated” in the process. This is exactly what happens when we substitute political science for real Science.

Put another way, these people hate Science, as it has made what we have today (modernity) possible. Some other reasons they want to kill Science are:

a) They are anti-American. We cannot maintain our lifestyle, or our position of world leadership, without many more competent STEM professionals. Globalists are working here to undermine the competency part, and thus America’s leadership.

b) They want nonsensical policies. Science is a gatekeeper that exposes when political policies on technical matters (COVID, climate, energy, etc.) are nonsense. When Science is diluted, the protection it offers to our country and its citizens is severely diminished.

c) They want citizens to support their nonsensical policies. Citizens need a Science background to be able to intelligently appreciate and apply to their own life, today’s complex technical issues. Regressives do not want Science-educated citizens making informed decisions.

d) Students need some Science background to be able to better understand (and effectively use), the many technical gadgets that have become an integral part of our modern daily life. The Left prefers that students focus on superficial things like social media.

e) Yet another liability of our time, is that more children (minors) are being given the authority to make major medical decisions. I’m opposed to that, but it follows that the more genuine Science education they have received, the better off they will be in deciding about potentially life-changing health matters.

f) Real Science involves polite, open-minded debate about problem-solving. Students need to be taught how to constructively discuss differences of opinion. The Woke mentality disdains discussion and debate.

g) In addition to the K-12 educational basics (3 R’s), we need graduates to be Critically Thinking, problem-solvers. Science is the most appropriate subject area to teach both Critical Thinking and problem-solving. Education opponents are aggressively working to cut those off at the pass

HOW are they assaulting Science? In my well-attended 2012 Congressional talks (sponsored by the House Science and Technology Committee), I discussed fifteen (15) ways Science is being attacked. To keep this condensed, here are ten (10) of them:

  1.  Using Consensus to imply Correctness
  2.  Using Peer Review to imply Accuracy
  3.  Using Scientists to imply Scientificness
  4.  Using Computer Models to imply Reality
  5.  Using Correlation to imply Causality
  6.  Using Selective Data to imply Actuality
  7. Using Precautionary Principle to imply Reasonableness
  8. Using Engineering to Replace Science
  9. Misusing words, like “Theory”
  10. Adjusting the Raw Data, to Support Political or Economic Agendas…

If you prefer soundbites, what is going on here is that the Left is taking advantage of the fact that most citizens are technically challenged, so they are trying to substitute political science for real Science, and are counting on most people not noticing.

Again, all this and more is explained in my Report: The Key to Fixing the US K-12 Education System. For those in a hurry, just read five pages, starting on Page 3.

Currently, 49 States have gone off the rails regarding their K-12 Science Standards! Unless we fix this — quickly — our future will be severely compromised.


Here are other materials by this scientist that you might find interesting:

Check out the Archives of this Critical Thinking substack.

WiseEnergy.orgdiscusses the Science (or lack thereof) behind our energy options.

C19Science.infocovers the lack of genuine Science behind our COVID-19 policies.

Election-Integrity.infomultiple major reports on the election integrity issue.

Media Balance Newsletter: a free, twice-a-month newsletter that covers what the mainstream media does not do, on issues from COVID to climate, elections to education, renewables to religion, etc. Here are the Newsletter’s 2023 Archives. Please send me an email to get your free copy. When emailing me, please make sure to include your full name and the state where you live. (Of course, you can cancel the Media Balance Newsletter at any time - but why would you?

Leave a comment

Share

Thanks for reading Critically Thinking About Select Societal Issues! Please pass a link to this article on to other associates who might benefit. They can subscribe for FREE to receive new posts (typically about once a week).

My Gazette: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, or, Truth, Justice, and The American Way?

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion is irrational, it's leftist philosophy without form, acceptance without accomplishment, and incompetence without consequence

By Rich Kozlovich

While on the surface DEI may seem relatively harmless, but the left knows this is ruse laying the groundwork to impose conditions and values on society that's antithetical to everything America has stood for.  There's that old axiom that says when conservatives decide to stop eating meat and become vegetarians that's with they do. When leftists decide eating meat is wrong, they demand everyone stop eating meat, and that's where DEI is taking the nation, and has now become a state sponsored religion promoting the destruction of America.

The nation is coming to a point where we're going to have to recognize Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion is diametrically opposed to Truth Justice, and the American Way, and is in point of fact economic, cultural, national suicide, and imposing it is unconstitutional, and the fact is, it's treason, which this next piece highlights.  This is what these DEI misfits really believe, and everything else is a load of horsepucky.  Get over it!

City 'equity' chief calls for U.S. to 'burn to the ground' - A city "equity' officer being paid some $75,000 a year by College Park, Maryland, is being profiled online for desiring that the United States "burn to the ground" so that her ideology "can rise from the ashes." And she wants it all to happen without any effort on her part, apparently, as she insists, "I don't want to work."...............The report reveals she said she is working with activists to orchestrate "how we will eat and live and grow after we burn it all down."...............She reminded, in 2021, "Remember we are at war against colonialism. We can't forget," and "I can't wait for society to collapse so MY ideology can rise from the ashes!".......

ACADEMIA IS A SCAM, A SNARE, AND A RACKET 
 
Former Harvard Medical Professor Details How His Defense of Truth During Pandemic Got Him Fired  Leah Barkoukis - March 19, 2024  -  At Harvard, Claudine Gay’s short tenure showed the world that you can botch your response to antisemitism on campus, dig a bigger hole for the University during congressional testimony about that response, and then rack up plagiarism allegation after plagiarism allegation and not much will happen to you. Sure, the former president ended up stepping down after the pressure was finally too great, but she’s still on faculty at Harvard getting her $900,000 salary..........
 

Editor's Note:  While this next one is not about the American Navy, but in point of fact the issues are the same, ergo, it actually is.  RK